Legal Opinion

Howell v. . Mills

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 31, 1874PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action for partition of real estate. The trial was at Special Term before a single judge. There are no findings of law or fact, and no exception reviewable in this court. The exceptions, filed five years after the judgment, to the "judgment" and "decree," present no question for review. (Code, §§ 267, 268; 3 Keyes, 434; 29 N.Y., 616; 38 id., 305; 13 id., 341.)

The only question which can be considered, and this is urged on behalf of the defendants, is that the court had no jurisdiction to entertain these proceedings. This is predicated upon the ground that the petition does not show…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Horton v. . McCoyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Blakeley v. . CalderNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  3. Weed v. . the N.Y. Harlem R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1864
  4. Douglass v. DayNew York Court of Appeals · 1867

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. . FaheyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Kromer v. FridayWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Perry v. MorseSupreme Court of Vermont · 1885
  4. Havey v. KelleherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  5. Prior v. PriorNew York Supreme Court · 1888

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API