Legal Opinion

Glasgow v. Baker

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 10, 1888No. 40PublishedCited by 8 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MISSOURI. The court stated the case as follows: The writ, of error in this case brings before us for review a judgment of the Supreme Court of 'the State of Missouri, rendered on the 11th. day of May, 1885, in a suit commenced in the St. Louis Land Court of St. Louis County, in that State, on the 15th day of September, 1853. This suit is in the nature of an action of ejectment to recover possession of about .200 acres of land.

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MISSOURI. The court stated the case as follows: The writ, of error in this case brings before us for review a judgment of the Supreme Court of 'the State of Missouri, rendered on the 11th. day of May, 1885, in a suit commenced in the St. Louis Land Court of St. Louis County, in that State, on the 15th day of September, 1853. This suit is in the nature of an action of ejectment to recover possession of about .200 acres of land. It was tried three or four times in the court of original jurisdiction, the last trial resulting in a verdict for.…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Miller

It will be seen at once that there is really no contest about the claim of the plaintiff, :unless the defendants have established some break in the continuity of the title which the - United States may have received from France by the treaty of 1803, or unless the exceptions in that treaty of private property take the land in controversy out of that class where the right of ownership was vested in the United S ;ates by the' treaty. We must turn then to the defence in jthis case to ascertain whether the decision of the Supreme Cpurt of Missouri is sound which held that defence to be a goq’d…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Guitard v. StoddardSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  2. Glasgow v. HortizSupreme Court of the United States · 1862

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cummings v. PowellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  2. Crystal Springs Land & Water Co. v. City of Los AngelesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1897
  3. Northrop Corporation v. Triad International Marketing S.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Donze Lake Development Corp. v. HollidayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Lake Superior Ship Canal, Railway & Iron Co. v. CunninghamU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API