Legal Opinion
Snyder v. Miller
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 5, 1916No. Civ. No. 1376PublishedCited by 2 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This is an action on a promissory note. Judgment passed for the plaintiff, and from said judgment the defendants take this appeal.
The record shows and, indeed, counsel for the appellants concede, that the judgment against the defendants, Rotten-berg and Case, was entered upon their default, duly entered, on failure to answer the complaint, on the eleventh day of May, 1914, which was six months prior to the date of the taking this appeal. The appeal as to those defendants is, therefore, abortive, as counsel concede, and they have expressly abandoned the same.
The complaint sets out the note…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. O'BryanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- San Francisco & Suburban Home Building Society v. LeonardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- San Jose Ranch Co. v. San Jose Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
- Branson v. CaruthersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Weintraub v. SoronowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931