Legal Opinion
Braden Shielding Systems v. Shielding Dynamics
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 8, 1992No. 92 C 1183PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ASPEN, District Judge:
Plaintiff Braden Shielding Systems (“Braden Shielding”) makes shielding systems for magnetic resonance imaging devices (“MRIs”). An MRI is a highly sophisticated diagnostic instrument with which doctors can map a patient’s tissues without surgery. Because the device uses magnetic fields, shielding is necessary to contain the fields and to prevent outside interference from distorting the image produced. Braden Shielding asserts that it holds the patent for its method of shielding MRIs.
In its complaint, Braden Shielding claims that defendant…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- PKWare, Inc. v. MeadeDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2000
- Original Creations, Inc. v. Ready America, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
- Boston Scientific Corp. v. Cook Group Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2017
- Century Industries, Inc. v. Wenger Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1994
- Cytomedix, Inc. v. BennettDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.