Legal Opinion
Judson v. Nissan Motor Co.
District Court, M.D. Alabama
Decided May 25, 1999No. Civil Action 99-D-24-SPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DE MENT, District Judge.
Before the court is Plaintiffs Motion To Remand (“Remand Mot.”), filed on February 1, 1999. Contained within Plaintiffs Motion To Remand is a request for costs and attorney’s fees incurred as a result of improper removal, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), which the court construes as a Motion For Attorney’s Fees. On February 17, 1999, Defendant Evenflo Company, Inc. (“Evenflo”) filed an Opposition To Remand, which the court construes as a Response (“Response”). 1 On February 24, 1999, Plaintiff filed her Response To Defendants’ Opposition To…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Jacqueline Burns v. Windsor Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Wilson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Pullman Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gardner v. Allstate Indem. Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2001
- IRIZARRY v. 3M COMPANYDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2023