Legal Opinion
City of Chicago v. Cecola
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided December 22, 1977No. 61648PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Johnson
Defendants, Salvatore Cecola, Juan Cruz, John Spadeas, Jeffrey C. Weiss, and Norman McCray, doing business as the Harem Leisure Spa, their agents and employees, and other unknown owners, appeal from the entry of a permanent injunction which found that because illegal, lewd, and blatantly sexual genital stimulation was occurring at the Harem Leisure Spa, the spa was a public nuisance. The defendants were perpetually enjoined from operating their business at 839 North LaSalle, Chicago, Illinois, their business address. The trial court granted a stay on its order, pending this appeal.
The issues…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Village of Maywood v. HoustonIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
- Cedar Park Cemetery Ass'n, Inc. v. CooperIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
- City of Pana v. Central Washed Coal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1913
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Wayne County Prosecuting Attorney v. LevenburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. MonosonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- City of Chicago v. CecolaIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
- State Ex Rel. Wayne County Prosecuting Attorney v. LevenburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1979