Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Cecola

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1979No. 50506PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Goudenhersh

Defendants, Salvatore Cecola, Juan Cruz, John Spadeas, Jeffrey C. Weiss and Norman McCray, doing business as Harem Leisure Spa, appealed from the order of the circuit court of Cook County permanently enjoining them from operating the business conducted at 839 North La Salle Street in Chicago. The appellate court reversed (56 Ill. App. 3d 143), and we allowed the city’s petition for leave to appeal.

The parties have stipulated that there is an establishment known as the Harem Leisure Spa located at 839 North La Salle Street owned by defendant Salvatore Cecola; that on September 3, 1974, Helena…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stead v. FortnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
  2. People ex rel. Dyer v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  3. People Ex Rel. Kerner v. HulsIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Minke v. HopemanIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Village of Spillertown v. PrewittIllinois Supreme Court · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Gilmore v. Stanmar, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  3. City of Chicago v. Festival Theatre Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
  4. City of Chicago v. Latronica Asphalt and Grading, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  5. People Ex Rel. Difanis v. BostonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API