Legal Opinion
Barnett v. Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore Lines
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 19, 1956No. Civ. No. 368-55PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MADDEN, District Judge.
This is an action wherein the plaintiff, Belford Barnett, has filed a supplemental petition seeking an order reinstating him to his position as an employee with the defendant, Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore Lines, together with compensation for loss of work.
The supplemental petition alleges that plaintiff has been a railroad employee since 1906 and an employee of defendant since its incorporation (sometime prior to 1935), that in July, 1935 while in employ of defendant he was injured, that he instituted suit in the Courts of the State of New Jersey for his injuries. He…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Slocum v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Moore v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Washington Terminal Co. v. BoswellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Kirby v. Pennsylvania R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Parker v. Illinois Cent. Ry. Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1952
3Cited by4 opinions
- Belford Barnett v. Pennsylvania-Reading Seashare LinesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
- Haley v. ChildersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
- Haley v. ChildersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
- Finlin v. Pennsylvania RailroadDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1960