Legal Opinion

Allen v. Pontius

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 21, 1921Published

1Opinion of the CourtBuchwalter, J.

This case was presented on both error and appeal.

*252The action below was brought by Woodson Poor on behalf of himself and all creditors of The German American Commercial and Savings Bank against the stockholders of the bank to recover unpaid stock subscriptions and to enforce the double liability against the stockholders. The superintendent of banks of Ohio was also made a party to the action. Judgment was rendered against the various defendant stockholders on the claim of double liability and the cause is before this court for review.

The question of unpaid subscriptions is not,here involved.

The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Gunn v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. In the Matter of Oliver Lee Co's BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  4. Sherman v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
  5. McGowan v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API