Legal Opinion

Dunbar v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 17, 1993No. A93A0376PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Judge.

David Lee Dunbar was tried before a jury and found guilty of selling crack cocaine. He appeals from the judgment of conviction and sentence entered by the trial court on the jury’s verdict of guilt.

1. Dunbar enumerates as error the purported violation of the rule of sequestration.

After the rule was invoked, OCGA § 24-9-61, the lead investigator testified first and then was permitted to remain in the courtroom during the remainder of trial to assist the presentation of the State’s case. Over objection, this witness was twice recalled to the stand. It was not an abuse of the trial…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gilmore v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Bramblett v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  3. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  4. State v. O'QUINNCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. Gower v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Mejak v. GranvilleArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Lowe v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  3. State v. CorhenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  4. Bentley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  5. England v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API