Legal Opinion

McKelvy v. Gugenheim

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 29, 1919No. 6149PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Nueces County Court; David M. Picton, Jr., Judge. ■Suit by S. Gugenheim and others against J. R. McKelvy and another. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtFly, C. J.

This is a suit instituted by S. Gugenheim and H. Cohn against J. R. McKel-vy and J. C. Baldwin to recover on a promissory note for $350, executed by the last-named parties, appellants herein, a paj'ment of $95.34 being admitted to have been made on the note. Afterwards the death of H. Cohn was suggested, and his only heirs, Anna Cohn and Joseph A. Cohn, were made plaintiffs. Appellants answered by general demurrer and general denial, and specially answered that they executed the promissory note; that Baldwin at the time of execution of the note obtained from his codefendant, McKelvy, a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Frith v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. Bay View Brewing Co. v. GrubbWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Burlington State Bank v. Marlin Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Neblett v. BarronCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  5. Ivy v. PughCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Zeigler v. Citizens' Bank of VenusCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. Jenness v. First Nat. Bank of GreenvilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API