Legal Opinion

Acosta v. Am. Pollution Control Corp.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 28, 2018No. 18-348Published

1Opinion of the Court

GREMILLION, Judge.

*471The plaintiff-appellant, Gabriel Acosta, appeals the trial court's judgment dismissing his claims with prejudice for overtime wages against his former employer, the defendant-appellee, American Pollution Control Corporation (AMPOL). For the following reasons, we affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Acosta was employed at AMPOL from April 2015 until his termination on January 9, 2017. In April 2017, Acosta filed a Rule to Show Cause via a summary proceeding why AMPOL should not be ordered to pay him $27,057.75 in overtime wages that he claimed to have earned over a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mart v. HillSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  2. Beard v. Summit InstituteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  3. Kenneth H. Lobell v. Cindy Ann RosenbergSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2015
  4. Lopez v. LopezLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API