Legal Opinion

Kenneth H. Lobell v. Cindy Ann Rosenberg

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 14, 2015No. 2015-C -0247PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Per curiam

bln this matter, we are called upon to determine whether the lessors properly terminated a lease. For the reasons that follow, we find the district court was correct in finding the lease was terminated, and the court of appeal erred in disturbing the district court’s judgment.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

By agreement dated January 25, 1957, Simon and Herman H. Rosenberg leased property .located at 2025 Canal Street in New Orleans to Eagle Enterprises, Inc. for a term of sixty years, to expire on May 31, 2017. The lease, hereinafter referred to as the “1957 lease,” provided:

TWENTY-SEVENTH: Time…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  2. Mart v. HillSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  3. Marin v. Exxon Mobil Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
  4. Mundy v. OrnsbyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Prejean v. GuillorySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Royer v. State, Department of Transportation & DevelopmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. Lobell v. RosenbergLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. Lobell v. RosenbergLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Constantin Land Trust v. Pitre Industries, L.L.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. Jolivette v. HebertLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API