Legal Opinion

State v. Hayes

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 31, 2011No. A-13 September Term 2010PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rivera-Soto

This appeal requires that we evaluate the denial of a request for an adjournment to obtain conflict-free counsel in the context of a motion to withdraw two guilty pleas. Defendant Michael Hayes, having pled guilty to charges arising out of two separate indictments pursuant to a written plea agreement, sought additional time to advance a request to withdraw his guilty pleas before sentencing; he represented to the trial court that he had sought to secure the services of two separate lawyers for that application, one of whom could not represent defendant due to a conflict of interest, and the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. State v. FritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  4. United States v. Andrew F. BurtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
  5. State v. SlaterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. State v. Terrence Miller (068558)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  2. State v. McDonaldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
  3. State v. MunroeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
  4. State v. Raymond D. Kates (070971)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
  5. State v. KatesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API