Sussen Rubber Co. v. Hertz

This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment and final order of the Cleveland Municipal Court against defendant, appellant herein, in the sum of $2,563.-85. The action arose out of plaintiff’s petition for conversion which contended that defendant wrongfully took possession of goods owned by the plaintiff, which allegedly had a value of $2,347.11.

The facts indicate that, in February 1965, Ilillcrest Auto Parts, a dealer in parts for automobiles, and Lee Motor Products, a supplier of such parts, entered into a discussion relative to the extension of credit by Lee to Hill-crest, which…