Legal Opinion
General Electric Co. v. Pettingell Supply Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 10, 1964PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhittemore, J.
The plaintiff by writ of replevin took from the defendant David S. Miller, assignee for the benefit of creditors of the defendant Pettingell Supply Company, certain large lamps that had been delivered by the plaintiff to Pettingell as ‘ 1 agent to sell or distribute” such lamps. Large lamps are “lamps used in commercial and industrial installations.” General Electric by outline bill of exceptions presents for our review the ruling of the judge in the Superior Court that because of the Uniform Commercial Code (Gr. L. c. 106, inserted by St. 1957, c. 765, § 1) the plaintiff must return the…
2Cited by21 opinions
- Nasco Equipment Co. v. MasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Bischoff v. ThomassonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Vonins, Inc. v. RaffNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- In Re Gross Mfg. & Importing Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1971
- Simmons First National Bank v. WellsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.