Legal Opinion
Monzon v. Martinez
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 31, 1993No. Civ. A. 92-4947PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
YANARTSDALEN, Senior District Judge.
The parties to this action have filed cross-motions for summary judgment. Because there is no genuine issue of material fact presented in this case, and, because plaintiff has failed to offer any credible evidence upon which a jury could reasonably return a judgment in his favor, defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (filed Doc. No. 19 and Revised Doc. No. 20) will be granted and plaintiffs motion for summary judgment (filed Doc. No. 13) will be denied.
Plaintiff Cesar…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Melzer v. WitsbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Wayne M. Zilich v. Gary Lucht, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Freestone v. CowanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- In Re the Marriage of GilbertCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- Freestone v. CowanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995