Matteucci's Super Save, Drug v. Hustad Corporation
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Castles
This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal of plaintiff’s claim, entered as a result of the granting of a motion for summary judgment in favor of defendants.
Plaintiff is Matteucci’s Super Save, Drug, a Montana corporation and will be referred to as Matteueci. Defendants include Hustad Corporation, a Montana corporation, called Hustad; Buttrey Foods, Inc., later merged with Jewel Companies, Inc., a New York Corporation; Oseo Drug, Inc., an Illinois corporation; and Oseo Drug Northwest, Inc., a Delaware corporation. The last three defendants will be referred to by name or as defendants.
Matte…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Slice v. Carozza Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Parker v. LevinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Norwood Shopping Center, Inc. v. MKR CORPORATIONDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
- Shaft v. CareyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Great A. & P. Tea Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fulton v. ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1975
- Danielson v. DanielsonMontana Supreme Court · 1977
- Baylor v. JacobsonMontana Supreme Court · 1976
- Rickard v. ParadisMontana Supreme Court · 1975
- Anaconda Co. v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.