Legal Opinion

Matteucci's Super Save, Drug v. Hustad Corporation

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1971No. 11998PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Castles

This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal of plaintiff’s claim, entered as a result of the granting of a motion for summary judgment in favor of defendants.

Plaintiff is Matteucci’s Super Save, Drug, a Montana corporation and will be referred to as Matteueci. Defendants include Hustad Corporation, a Montana corporation, called Hustad; Buttrey Foods, Inc., later merged with Jewel Companies, Inc., a New York Corporation; Oseo Drug, Inc., an Illinois corporation; and Oseo Drug Northwest, Inc., a Delaware corporation. The last three defendants will be referred to by name or as defendants.

Matte…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Slice v. Carozza Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  2. Parker v. LevinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Norwood Shopping Center, Inc. v. MKR CORPORATIONDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  4. Shaft v. CareyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Great A. & P. Tea Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fulton v. ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Danielson v. DanielsonMontana Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Baylor v. JacobsonMontana Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Rickard v. ParadisMontana Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Anaconda Co. v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API