Legal Opinion

Great A. & P. Tea Co. v. Bailey

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 26, 1966No. Appeal, 131PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Eagen,

This is an action in equity seeking injunctive relief. For the purpose of this ^appeal, the facts may be briefly summarized as follows:

In 1954, Bobert M. Bailey and Elizabeth S., his wife, were the record owners of farm land in Crawford County, Pennsylvania, on which they proposed to develop a shopping center. At that time, the tract was cut in two by a public highway known as IT.S. Boutes, Nos. 6, 19 and 322.

On November 23, 1954, the Baileys entered into a written lease with the Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Inc. (A. & P.), whereby a certain specifically…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jones v. Park Lane for Convalescents, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Baederwood, Inc. v. MoyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Heidt v. Aughenbaugh Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Siciliano v. MislerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. McCandless v. BurnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Dolgencorp, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
  2. Ress v. BarentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Pocono Summit Realty, LLC v. Ahmad Amer, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Berger v. AckermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Mishkin v. Temple Beth ElSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API