Legal Opinion

Pulham v. Kirsling

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 2019No. 20180458PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice Himonas, opinion of the Court:1

*1219INTRODUCTION

¶1 This appeal presents us with the unfortunate case of a divorce being strung out for the better part of a decade while the parties contest issues of child support and parent-time. The court of appeals held that it had limited appellate jurisdiction over this matter and that the district court's orders regarding child support and parent-time should be upheld. We agree and now affirm.

BACKGROUND

Trial and Amended Divorce Decree

¶2 Kristen Pulham and William Kirsling were married in September 2008. In November 2008, Pulham gave birth to the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Child v. GondaUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Jensen v. Intermountain Power AgencyUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Hill v. Superior Property Management Services, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Kilpatrick v. Bullough Abatement, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Adoption B.B. v. R.K.B.Utah Supreme Court · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McKitrick v. GibsonUtah Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Wilson v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
  3. Freight Tec Management v. ChemexCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
  4. Vanderwood v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
  5. In re A.H...Utah Supreme Court · 2024

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API