Parris v. Cave
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, J.
In this case we hold that service by defendant’s attorneys of a file-stamped copy of a formal order sustaining a demurrer with leave to amend constitutes lawful service of notice of the order pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 472b.
Plaintiffs appeal the dismissal of their complaint against defendant Reece Cave.
Defendant filed a demurrer to plaintiffs’ second amended complaint. Before the hearing on the demurrer, plaintiffs’ attorney sent a letter to the trial court stipulating that the demurrer should be sustained with 30 days leave to amend on the condition that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Harris v. Minnesota Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
- Tri-County Elevator Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Cowee v. MarshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Goetz v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. $20,000 United States CurrencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Briggs v. Select Portfolio Servicing CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021