Legal Opinion

Howland v. Stitzer

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 8, 1952No. 103PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.

In the State of New York, where an action for divorce is brought by a husband or wife, and the final'judgment of divorce has been rendered in favor of the wife, the Court upon application of the husband on notice, and proof of the remarriage of the wife, must modify such judgment and any orders made with respect thereto by annulling the provisions of such final judgment or orders, or of both, directing payments of money for the support of the wife. Thompson’s Laws of New York, Civil Practice Act, Section 11120; Dumproff v. Dumproff, 138 Misc. 298, 244 N.Y.S. 597; Kirkbride v. Van Note, 275…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Galusha v. . GalushaNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Goldman v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. Winter v. . WinterNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  4. In Re the Accounting of RhinelanderNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. Kirkbride v. Van NoteNew York Court of Appeals · 1937

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bunn v. BunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Church v. HancockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Howland v. StitzerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Bolin v. BolinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Williford v. WillifordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API