Legal Opinion

Southern Pac. R. Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 29, 1931No. 6387Published

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge:

This is an appeal from a deeree [ (D. C.) 43 F.(2d) 591] vacating a patent issued in January, ,1921, to the appellants by the United States government to the east one-half of the northeast one-quarter of section 35, Township 3 south, range 10 east, S. B. & M., an 80-acre tract in Riverside county, Cal. The trial eourt found that the patent therefor was issued inadvertently and through the error of a clerk,in the Land Office, who certified that the land was clear and subject to patent, whereas an appeal by the appellants herein, from a decision rendered by the register…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Noble v. Union River Logging RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Burke v. Southern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Barden v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Brown v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Lane v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API