Legal Opinion
Woods v. City of Beavercreek
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 11, 1989No. 88-CA-38PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wolff, Presiding Judge.
Appellants, David Woods (“Woods”), and Jesse Woolum (“Woolum”), appeal from a judgment granting a directed verdict in favor of appellee, city of Beavercreek (“Beavercreek” or “appellee”). Appellants’ cases, originally filed as separate actions, were consolidated for trial by agreement of counsel. (See Motion to Consolidate dated July 25, 1986.)
On June 12, 1984, after 10:00 p.m., Woolum was operating his motorcycle southbound on Wine Coup Court, Beavercreek, with Woods as his passenger. The two suffered various personal injuries when Woolum drove the motorcycle into a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Eastlake v. Ohio Board of Building StandardsOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- State ex rel. Ryland v. SchinkalOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- Pierce v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
- State, Ex Rel. Ohio Motorists Assn. v. MastenOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
- Paulin v. John R. Jurgensen Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1982
3Cited by6 opinions
- Patton v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Oliphant v. AWP, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. MurnahanOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Orren v. BWF Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015
- Shunkwiler v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Court of Claims · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.