Legal Opinion

Harris v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 24, 1950No. 32897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

'Counsel for the defendant Edmond Harris contend that the evidence is insufficient to warrant a verdict of guilty on either count. In support of this contention the cases of Harris v. State, 41 Ga. App. 324 (152 S. E. 910), and Singleton v. State, 12 Ga. App. 572 (77 S. E. 888), are cited. The facts in those cases show that the court was dealing with one single transaction in which no sale was consummated. The facts in the instant case, as will be observed by reference to the stipulations above set forth, set out an entirely different state of facts and such facts are sufficient to prove…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Buchanan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  2. Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  3. Singleton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  4. Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Faglier v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  2. Stinespring v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API