Dohm v. Haskin
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Berrien. (O’Hara, J.) Bill to set aside the foreclosure of certain mortgages. Complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
In 1874, Almerian and Malcolm B. Haskin became the owners as tenants in common of a flouring-mill, the property in dispute in this case. August 29, 1885, Almerian sold and deeded his half interest to George E. Hotchkin, who executed a mortgage to him for the full purchase price. Hotchkin and Malcolm Has-kin carried on the business as copartners until September, 1888, when Hotchkin conveyed his undivided interest to complainant, and the partnership was dissolved. Malcolm then leased complainant’s interest for a year for $300.
*146Soon after the organization of the partnership between Hotchkin and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Buell v. IrwinMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
3Cited by8 opinions
- Harney v. MontgomeryWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
- Talton v. BAC Home Loans Servicing LPDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012
- Feldman v. Equitable Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Drayton v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Kim v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, NAMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.