Kim v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtDonofrio, P.J.
Plaintiffs appeal as of right the trial court’s order granting summary disposition in favor of *202defendant in this mortgage foreclosure dispute. Because defendant was not authorized to proceed with the sheriffs sale, given that it had failed to record its mortgage interest before the sale as required by MCL 600.3204(3), we reverse and remand.
On July 11, 2007, plaintiffs (husband and wife) obtained a $615,000 loan from Washington Mutual Bank (the Bank) to refinance their home. As security for their indebtedness, plaintiffs granted the Bank a mortgage interest in the property, and, on July 25,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Coblentz v. City of NoviMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- Danse Corp. v. City of Madison HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Department of Transportation v. TomkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Smith v. StolbergMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- In Re Wayne County ProsecutorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kim v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, NaMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
- Bryan v. JPMorgan Chase BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- Talton v. BAC Home Loans Servicing LPDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012
- McCann v. U.S. Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012
- Gregory v. Citimortgage, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.