Legal Opinion

Bergenfeld v. Alexander's Department Stores, Inc.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 17, 1954PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

No negligence of the appellant department store was shown here. A vendor of a chattel manufactured by a third person, who, as in this case, neither knows nor has reason to know that it is, or is likely to be, dangerous, is not subject to liability for harm caused by the dangerous character or condition of the chattel even though he could have discovered it by an inspection or test of the chattel before selling it (Restatement, Torts, § 402).

The judgment for plaintiffs should be reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs; and judgment in favor of third-party defendant affirmed,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wellman v. Supreme Farmstead Equipment, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Lehmann v. R. H. Macy & Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1955
  3. Gilbert v. BarouchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API