Legal Opinion

Lehmann v. R. H. Macy & Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided February 24, 1955PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Plaintiff sustained an injury while trying on a hat picked up from a counter of defendant store as a result o£ a hatpin being imbedded in the veil rather than in the hat proper where it belonged. The Trial Justice denied the motion to dismiss, the jury rendering a verdict for plaintiff. This was erroneous in view of the absence of any .proof of active negligence on the part of defendant’s employees or of any notice to it of the defect complained of.

Insofar as it is possible that the manufacturer may have delivered this hat to the store with the pin negligently imbedded in the veil, no…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Liedeker v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  2. Liedeker v. Sears, Roebuck Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Bergenfeld v. Alexander's Department Stores, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1954

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wellman v. Supreme Farmstead Equipment, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API