Legal Opinion
Kesler v. Schetky Equipment Corporation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 7, 1961No. Civ. 7990PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HALBERT, District Judge.
Defendant Schetky has moved in this action to quash service of summons and to dismiss the action. The ground for such motion is that this Court lacks jurisdiction over Schetky. It is asserted that Schetky is an Oregon corporation, with its principal place of business in Oregon, and that it does no business in California which would make it subject to service of process of this Court.
For the purpose of deciding a motion to quash service of summons upon a foreign corporation, the facts averred in the affidavits of the opposing parties relating to the issue of whether the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Harold Noel Arrowsmith, Jr. v. United Press InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- O'Hare International Bank, a National Banking Association v. Berlon E. HamptonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- Jake Harold Bowman, Philip G. Griffin, A. Donald Brinton and Midland Industries, Inc. v. Curt G. Joa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
- Jurko v. Jobs Europe AgencyOhio Court of Appeals · 1975
- Cohan v. Municipal Leasing Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.