Application of Charles L. Cormany, William R. Dial and Blaine O. Pray
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ALMOND, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the final rejection of claim 28 of appellants’ application entitled “Stabilized Compositions.” 1 No claim has been allowed.
The invention relates to the stabilization, against decomposition, of methyl-chloroform (1,1,1-trichloroethane), an industrial solvent useful for liquid and vapor phase degreasing. In such usage, methylchloroform evidences a strong tendency to decompose, particularly when in contact with light metals such as aluminum, thus destroying its practical value as a solvent.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Application of Arthur R. Tomlinson, Harry H. Hall and William F. GeigleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Application of Philip S. Fay and Fred J. FoxCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Application of WilliamsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
- Application of Donald Wallace Adamson and Walter Mark DuffinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
- Fessenden v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Application of Alfred C. WhitonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970