Legal Opinion

Penrose v. Canton National Bank

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 21, 1925PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBond, C. J.

This appeal is from ,a judgment on a verdict of a jury against the appellant for -the amount of principal and interest on two promissory notes which he had indorsed. On ■one the maker w’a.s the Springdale Building and Savings' Association, of which the appellant was president; and the other had as maker H. Walter G-anster, a director and attorney for the association. The latter note was secured, according to the testimony of Ganster, by a note of the .association held as collateral. Both loams were for the association. Each of the notes sued on was the last of a series of renewed notes. The…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Tiffany v. National Bank of Mo.Supreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Barnet v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Brown v. Marion National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. National Bank v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  5. Rosa v. . ButterfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1865

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Carozza v. Federal Finance & Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  2. Meadow Brook National Bank v. RecileDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1969
  3. Crothers v. National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
  4. Bichel Optical Laboratories, Inc. v. Marquette National BankDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1971
  5. Rabinowich v. EliasbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API