Legal Opinion

Higgins v. Philadelphia Gas Works

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 9, 1985No. Bankruptcy 85-0474PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KATZ, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Sean and Catherine Higgins (“plaintiffs”) have filed exceptions to the Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law of United States Bankruptcy Judge William A. King, Jr. For the reasons set forth below, I grant plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’ fees, pursuant to the Civil Rights Attorney’s Fees Awards Act of 1976 (“Fee Awards Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 1988.

Plaintiffs filed a voluntary joint petition under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code on December 28, 1982. On January 20, 1983, plaintiffs filed a complaint against Philadelphia Gas Works…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Vernita Smith, No. 96-1370 v. Philadelphia Housing Authority Larghne Lahm John Varallo Claude Ross. Carmen Rivera, No. 96-1379 v. Philadelphia Housing Authority Anthony Holland John Varallo Claude RossCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  2. Watts v. Pennsylvania Housing Finance Co. (In Re Watts)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Saunders v. Reeher (In Re Saunders)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. In Re SzostekUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Velez v. St. Mary Hospital (In Re St. Mary Hospital)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API