Course v. Stead

4 U.S. 22 (____)

4 Dall. 22

Course et al.

versus

Stead et Ux. et al.

Supreme Court of United States.

I. Ingersoll, for the defendants in error.

By the COURT:

The objection is not sufficient to quash the writ of error. The teste may be amended by our own record of the duration of the last term; and it is, of course, amendable.

II. Ingersoll objected, that the writ of error was not directed to any Circuit Court; for, its address was "To the Judges of the Circuit Court, holden in and for the district aforesaid:" whereas no district was previously named.

Dallas, in reply, observed, that the district of…