Allen-West Commission Co. v. Patillo
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
1Opinion of the Court
RINER, District Judge.
This was an action at law, brought by the plaintiff in error against the defendants in error, to recover $2,732.50, with interest, charged for commissions alleged to be due from the defendants to the plaintiff of $1.25 per bale, on 2,186 bales of cotton which the plaintiff alleges the defendants failed to ship to it as a cotton factor and commission merchant at St. Louis, Mo., pursuant to the terms of an oral agreement made and entered into by and between the plaintiff and the defendants in the early part of the year 1891. The plaintiff’s petition contains the following…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Freeland v. Heron, Lenox & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1812
- Porter v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
- Atkinson v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
- American Bell Tel. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1895
3Cited by11 opinions
- Independent School Dist. of Sioux City v. RewCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
- Patillo v. Allen-West Commission Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- In re HawksDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1913
- Willard Helburn, Inc. v. SpiewakCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Patillo v. Allen-West Commission Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.