Legal Opinion

Commonwealth ex rel. Fort Pitt Bridge Works v. Continental Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 1968No. Appeal, No. 62PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Musmanno,

Fort Pitt Bridge Works, hereinafter referred to as Fort Pitt, sold and delivered to A. J. Marsolino 2,217,-087 pounds of structural steel at 17.275 cents per pound, to be used by him in the erection of a bridge on State legislative route 798, section 3.

Marsolino had executed a labor and material bond in favor of the Commonwealth in order to secure the payment of the materials furnished in the prosecution of this state work, such bond being required by the Act of June 1, 1945, P. L. 1242, as amended, 36 P.S. §670-404. The defendant, Continental Casualty Co., was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Great American Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Erie Trust Co. Bank v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. of London, Ltd.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth ex rel. Walters Tire Service, Inc. v. National Union Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  2. Roman Mosaic & Tile Co. v. Thomas P. Carney, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Price Bros. v. Charles J. Rogers Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Eastern Steel Const. v. International FidelitySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  5. J.C. Snavely & Sons, Inc. v. Web M & E, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API