Legal Opinion
State v. MacNab
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided August 15, 2002No. CC CM9721537; CA A103792; SC S48039PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.
The issue presented in this criminal case is whether the ex post facto clauses of the Oregon or the United States constitutions prohibit defendant’s criminal conviction for failure to register as a sex offender. ORS 181.599 (1995).
In 1990, defendant was convicted of sexual abuse in the first degree for an act of sexual misconduct that he committed in 1987. The court sentenced defendant to five years in prison. Defendant was released on parole in 1991. From 1991 to 1994, defendant’s parole officer annually registered defendant as a sex offender, as required by former ORS 181.518 (1989),…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. JessHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. UptonOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- R.W. v. SandersSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
- State v. CavanOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. SelnessOregon Supreme Court · 2002
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.