Legal Opinion

Doe v. Attorney General

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided August 11, 1999PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, J.

We consider once again a challenge to the registration and notification requirements of the Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification Act, G. L. c. 6, §§ 178C-1780 (act or sex offender act).2 In 1993, the plaintiff, John Doe, then fifteen years old, entered into a negotiated plea agreement with the Commonwealth pursuant to which he was adjudicated delinquent by reason of the rape of a child, G. L. c. 265, § 23. Doe admitted that he had twice forced a four year old girl to perform oral sex on him. He agreed to enter the plea in reliance on statutory provisions holding juvenile…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Packaging Industries Group, Inc. v. CheneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  4. Aime v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  5. Doe v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Roe v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  2. Doe v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  3. State v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  4. Doe, Sex Offender Registry Board No. 1211 v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  5. State v. GuidryHawaii Supreme Court · 2004

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API