Legal Opinion

Wyoming v. Colorado

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 20, 1940No. 10, OriginalPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hughes

The State of Wyoming sought leave to file its petition for a rule requiring the State of Colorado to show cause why it should not be adjudged in contempt for violation of the decree in this suit, restraining diversions of water from the Laramie river. 259 U. S. 419, 496; 260 U. S. 1; 286 U. S. 494; 298 U. S. 573.

In response, Colorado asked that evidence be taken to determine the amount of return flow to the Laramie river from the diversions at the headgates of meadowland ditches and that Colorado have credit therefor. This matter had been considered by the Court in framing its decree (298 U.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wyoming v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Wyoming v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. State of Wyoming v. State of ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Wyoming v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Nebraska v. WyomingSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Nebraska v. WyomingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Texas v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. A & B Irrigation District v. Idaho Department of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  5. St. John v. BrownDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API