Legal Opinion

Shutan v. Bloomenthal

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1939No. 24895. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilson

The plaintiff, Emma Shutan, brought an action in the superior court of Cook county against the defendants, Jacob Bloomenthal and E. R. Bennecke', co-partners, doing business as Bloomenthal and Bennecke, to recover damages for alleged negligence in the course of dental services rendered to her. Plaintiff, fifty years of age, was an employee of a safety deposit company in Chicago. Defendants, specialists in extractions, are engaged in the practice of the dental profession. By her complaint plaintiff charged that incident to an unskillful extraction of one of her teeth defendants broke her jaw,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blumb v. GetzIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Mirich v. T. J. Forschner Contracting Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Bollenbach v. BloomenthalIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Shutan v. BloomenthalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1938

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bartolucci v. FalletiIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Pennington v. McLeanIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Graham v. St. Luke's HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  4. Haggerty v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  5. Dregne v. Five Cent Cab Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1943

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API