Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Peavy v. Goss

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1896PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Cebtieied Questions from the Court of Civil Appeals for the First District, in an appeal from DeWitt County.

1Opinion of the Court

GAINES, Chief Justice.

In this case the Court of Civil Appeals for the First Supreme Judicial District have certified for our determination the following questions:

“Suit by appellant on bond of vendor of malt liquors, to recover of appellees $500 liquidated damages, for alleged breach of one of the provisions of the 9th section of the act of the 23rd Legislature (Chap'-121, page 177) entitled ‘An Act to regulate the sale of vinous or malt liquors or medicated bitters; to fix a tax upon all persons, or associations- of persons selling such liquors; to define the time and manner of collecting…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Adams v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Labar v. NicholsMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Wilson v. NoonanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Huston v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  2. Johnson v. RollsTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Ex Parte SullivanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. Southern National Bank of Houston v. City of AustinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Ellis v. BrooksTexas Supreme Court · 1908

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API