Legal Opinion

Justh v. . Nat. B'k of the Commonwealth

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 26, 1874PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This action was brought, as appears by the complaint, upon the theory that the defendant bank had participated in the fraud by which William E. Gray Co. procured a loan from the plaintiffs of their two checks, amounting to $40,000. The proof entirely failed to sustain that theory, and the action is now sought to be sustained upon a very different one. What that is will appear from a short statement of the case.

Gray, on the 10th of December, 1869, borrowed of the plaintiffs their check for $30,000, and, a few minutes later, another for $10,000. These loans were made upon collaterals of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Continental National Bank v. National Bank of the CommonwealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. First Nat. Bank of Jersey City v. . LeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Barker v. ParkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1822

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Southwick v. First National Bank of MemphisNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Stephens v. . Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Whiting v. . Hudson Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Hathaway v. . County of DelawareNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  5. Pittsburgh-Westmoreland Coal Co. v. . KerrNew York Court of Appeals · 1917

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API