Paulink v. American Express Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
The plaintiff’s declaration is for money had and received. The bill of particulars sets out four several sums, each described as “Money paid for traveler’s check unused,” with specification of the amount. The defendant pleaded in answer a general denial and the statute of limitations. It was agreed that these several sums were received by the defendant on the dates alleged in 1915 and 1916, and that, when each was paid, the defendant issued to the plaintiff its “cheque” and its “remitter’s receipt.” These were the same in each instance, except as to dates and amounts. Each “cheque” was drawn…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Carr v. National Security BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Canton v. ThomasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- American Express Co. v. Cosmopolitan Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Sogomonian v. C. F. Hovey Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Beecher v. Cosmopolitan Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Kerwin v. DonaghyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Povey v. Colonial Beacon Oil Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Morales v. Sun Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Reilly v. Selectmen of BlackstoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Greer v. KooikerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.