Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. Philadelphia School District

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 12, 1938No. Appeals, 63 and 64PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The minor plaintiff, 12 years of age, was injured while playing on the fire escape of one of the schools maintained by appellee. It appears the child tripped over a pile of books placed on the steps by other pupils during recess. Appellants contended that permitting the chil dren to place books on tbe fire escape as a daily babit and to use it for play, constituted a nuisance which tbe school district negligently permitted to exist.

Tbe court below properly concluded that tbe condition described by appellants’ witnesses did not constitute a nuisance. At most, tbe agents and servants…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Carlo v. Scranton School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hartness v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Kesman v. Fallowfield Township School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Supler v. North Franklin Township School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Carter v. United Novelty & Premium Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Devlin v. Philadelphia School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API