Legal Opinion

Harold Roberts v. Federal Crop Insurance Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 19, 1958No. 16002PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The District Court granted summary judgment in favor of appellee upon the ground that the record showed that appellants had failed to comply with the conditions precedent of crop insurance issued to them by appellee. The issue presented on the motion below and again on appeal here was whether or not the appel-lee had lawfully waived or was estopped to require compliance by appellants with the conditions precedent of the insurance contract.

Judge Sam Driver justly and properly disposed of the cause and we adopt his reasons as ours for affirming the judgment.

Affirmed on opinion below, Roberts v.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Roberts v. Federal Crop Insurance CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1958

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Havemeyer Textile v. Federal Insurance AdministratorDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1983
  2. WILLIAMSBURGH DOLL & NOVELTY CORP. INC. v. GiuffridaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1982
  3. Beacon Fruit & Produce Co., Inc. v. H. Harris & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1958
  4. Dixie Warehouse v. Federal Emergency Mgmt. AgencyDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API