Department of Corporations v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
IRION, J.
The instant petition for a writ of mandate presents the question of whether the California Department of Corporations (the DOC) may be held liable for investment losses suffered by investors who purchased fraudulent securities from brokers subject to “desist and refrain orders” after those orders were rescinded by the DOC. The real parties in interest contend that under Government Code section 815.6, which creates a private right of action against public entities that fail to discharge a “mandatory duty,” the DOC may be held liable for such losses because the DOC violated…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Moore v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Mirkin v. WassermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Morris v. County of MarinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Paterno v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rukhsana Chaudhry v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Lawson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- San Mateo Union High School District v. County of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- AREI II CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- All Angels Preschool/Daycare v. County of MercedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.