Wallace v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtStevenson, C.J.
Believing Michael Wallace had thrown a Molotov cocktail at a vehicle, the State charged him with attempted second degree arson and making, possessing, throwing, projecting, placing or discharging a destructive device. A jury found Wallace guilty as charged and, in an interrogatory verdict, determined Wallace had “possessed” and “discharged” a destructive device. The so-called 10-20-life statute provides for a ten-year mandatory minimum sentence in the event the defendant possesses a destructive device during the commission of the crime and a twenty-year mandatory minimum in the event the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. OverfeltSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Tucker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- Bundrage v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Grant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- ISSAC WOODS v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021