Legal Opinion
Tucker v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided January 21, 1999No. 91,923PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
726 So.2d 768 (1999)
Owen L. TUCKER, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 91,923.
Supreme Court of Florida.
January 21, 1999.
Owen L. Tucker, pro se, Miami, Florida, for Petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Lori E. Nelson, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, Florida, for Respondent.
2Per curiam
We have for review Tucker v. State, 701 So.2d 398 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), based upon the following certified question of great public importance:
IN A CASE WHERE THERE IS ONLY ONE DEFENDANT AND ASSAILANT, WHO HAS BEEN CONVICTED OF CRIMES FOR WHICH THE PENALTIES MAY BE ENHANCED PURSUANT TO…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. OverfeltSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- State v. TrippSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- State v. HargroveSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
- Webster v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Overfelt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by56 opinions
- Bundrage v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- State v. EstevezSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- State v. IseleySupreme Court of Florida · 2006
- Bryant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Stoute v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.