Legal Opinion
Vincent D. Todisco v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 19, 1962No. 17311_1PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MERRILL, Circuit Judge.
Appellant, following jury trial, was adjudged guilty of attempting to bribe an Internal Revenue agent in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 201. He appealed from that judgment.
Appellant is an attorney at law practicing in Fresno, California. In March, 1960, he was representing a client in attempting to negotiate a compromise settlement of tax liability as assessed by the tax court. In these negotiations the Internal Revenue Service was represented by Agent Earl E. Oto.
In the course of negotiations appellant had made several statements to Oto assuring him of rewards in the event…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Silverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- On Lee v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Monroe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
3Cited by48 opinions
- Paul John Carbo, Frank Palermo, Joseph Sica, Louis Tom Dragna, and Truman K. Gibson, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Paul A. Gorin v. United States of America, Henry Grillo v. United States of America, Saul Glassman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1963
- People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Marion Francis Fountain and Roosevelt Tremble v. United States of America, Eugene J. Marshall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Robert Craig, Frank P. North, Jr., Peter v. Pappas and Jack E. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.