Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Eason v. Flannigan

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 23, 2002No. 01-507PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wh. "Dub" Arnold, Chief Justice.

Chiefjustice. This case a quiet-title action. We do not reach the merits raised in the appeal because the trial court’s order fails to comply with Arkansas Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b).

Appellees Robert Flannigan Jr., Cindy Flannigan, Mike Hook, and Karen Hook (hereinafter “Flannigan”) filed suit against the State of Arkansas, Arkansas Game and Fish Commission (hereinafter “AGFC”) in Craighead County Chancery Court, Eastern District. Flannigan requested that title to Lots 1 and 4 of Section 23, Township 15 North, Range 6 East (hereinafter “Lots”), in Craighead…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Koonce v. MitchellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Doe v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Stockton v. Sentry InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Horn v. BlaneyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. XTO Energy, Inc. v. ThackerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
  2. City of Corning v. CochranSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Chapman v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Toland v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017
  5. Stone v. Washington Regional Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API